The Crown has violated British constitutional principles
Royal Arch Freemasonry and Talmudic law is at the heart of the UK’s systemic corruption, with those at the highest echelons of governance, including the Crown, participating and driving it. UK corruption.
Is it time to end the Monarchy due to corruption and violation of the rights of the people under the Constitution?
In April this year, only after his death, the Express published an article titled “Prince Philip’s secret life as Freemason – Duke’s work in tight-lipped society remembered“, with the article exposing that “a number of Royal Family members are associated with The Freemasons”. That is not altogether true, because a number of the Royal Family are themselves freemasons, not associated with, but they are and so are the leaders of the justice system.
You may ask, what is the significance of that? This article answers that question, in some intricate detail and in more ways than one.
Is freemasonry responsible for decimation of the rule of law and British constitutional principles?
It is a fact that many of the Royals, a significant number of judges, senior police officers, politicians and ministers are all freemasons. Freemasons govern the political, judicial and regulatory establishment from the top down.
The UK’s lawyers are actively encouraged to join freemasonry and the four Inns of the Court are enshrined in masonic symbolism, but what is now revealed is that the UK is being governed by colluding freemasons who all protect their own. UK corruption.
It is certainly not about Judaism, or any religion, but it is a fact that this corruption is stemming from Jewish Zionist freemasons in power who protect the collective organisational structure and collude amongst fellow brethren to achieve desired outcomes, canonized in secrecy.
Compliance is rewarded, often at the expense of the taxpayer, a form of bribery, whereby members, judges, police officers and other regulatory officials are offered promotions for executing orders given by those higher up the organisational chain of governance.
The collective organisation structure protect their members and affiliates from prosecution, with a complex network of corruptors, each fulfilling different roles across the UK’s public authorities
Royal Arch Freemasonry
Therefore let us with awe and reverence bend before his Holy Name and say: Almighty Father, who in the hour of peril and persecution assisted Thy Chosen People Israel and subdued their enemies, bestow on us, we beseech Thee, a continuance of Thy favour and protection”
Holy Royal Arch, Aldersgate Chapter of Improvement
The Royal Arch rituals are explicit in the Talmud, because Royal Arch freemasonry is, effectually, the practice of Talmudic Judaism. The allegory of the exaltation Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch ceremony is based on the Old Testament telling of the return to Jerusalem from the Babylonish captivity to rebuild the city and temple. Effectually, true Royal Arch freemasons are Jewish Zionists.
From the Talmud’s Babha Bathra, it is cited that “All things pertaining to the Goim are like a desert; the first person to come along and take them can claim them for his own”.
“Goy”, Goim” or Goyim” is a term for a gentile, a non-Jew and the Talmud denotes hatred for the Goim or Goyim, and their follower’s instructions, claimed to be from above, are to “dispossess the Goyim of everything, even the world”.
“The only sacrifice required is that we remove the unclean from amongst us” (Talmud – Zohar).
“In the places of the fourth heaven are those who lamented over Zion and Jerusalem, and all those who destroyed idolatrous nations and those who killed off people who worship idols are clothed in purple garments so that they may be recognised and honoured” ( Talmud – Zohar).
It is the inherent conviction and a doctrine of Royal Arch freemasons, those at the highest echelons of Government and even the Monarch, to dispossess those outside of their sect of their possessions. That is precisely what the courts they control have been doing, and more so in recent times.
The oath sworn by freemasons to assist and support their brethren, goes against the constitutional oath of judicial independence. Which ones are they breaching? The proof is in the pudding.
In our recent article, we exposed how Sir Geoffrey Vos, breached his judicial oath, acting with ill-will, to conceal fraud committed by Jeremy Robin Bloom, the former senior partner of Womble Bond Dickinson and a fellow Jewish freemason. Is it a co-incidence that both Bloom and Vos are Jewish freemasons? We think not.
The UK’s governance are Royal Arch freemason members of the Supreme Grand Chapter
Robert Buckland QC MP, the Lord Chancellor, Minister for Justice is a Jewish Zionist freemason and on 21st May 2013 in the Commons Chamber, Buckland admitted it himself, “the House will know, because it is a matter of record, that I am a freemason”. UK corruption.
The Lord Chief Justice, Sir Ian Burnett of Maldon is a Jewish freemason and so is Michael Ellis QC MP, the Attorney General.
The Law Ministers, Buckland, Burnett and Ellis are sworn into office to act in a constitutionally proper way, but they have not been doing so.
Under section 3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, the Law Ministers are all under a legal duty to “uphold the continued independence of the judiciary“.
FirstforNews.com’s investigation revealed that it’s the Law Ministers themselves who have been coercing fellow brethren, members of the judiciary to provide assistance to other freemasons and those of whom they are affiliated, again, all acting under the guise of the Crown.
The constitutional oath of office – UK corruption
The constitutional oath of office is sworn to be upheld by Her Majesty and all ministers, judges and police officers who take office in central government under the Crown.
The fact is, that the Monarch herself and a significant number of judges have breached their oaths, but they remain in office, why, we ask?
The constitutional oath of office was established to protect civilians from acts of tyranny by those in office, including the Monarch, judges, police officers and all officers under the Crown.
The Promissory Oaths Act of 1868 is law today, law that is in place to regulate the conduct of those in positions of trust, in particular, judges.
In our investigation, FirstforNews.com found that when the oaths are breached, there is no regulation, absolutely no enforcement whatsoever of the law. Of course, laws only work, if they are enforced, and these laws are not, leaving the British people open to tyranny and oppressive acts of abuse by the State.
I, Geoffrey Charles Vos, do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of Master of the Rolls, and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.
The oath taken by Sir Geoffrey Vos when taking office as Master of the Rolls.
Freemasonry is wholly incompatible with the oath of office
When judges breach their oaths, it’s the job of the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice to hold them to account, yet doing so conflicts with their own sinister motives as Royal Arch freemasons and the oaths they took.
Looking out for one’s brethren comes first over the law, and the judges who are doing the breaching, usually seeking to deprive Goyim (non Jews and non freemasons) of their possessions, are, for the vast majority, fellow brethren. The perpetrators never get punished and their acts of tyranny get concealed. England’s laws were not designed to work that way.
Freemason judges act with “favour and ill-will” to assist fellow brethren, lawyers and the corporations they work for in depriving the Goyim of their possessions. That is the issue at the heart of the UK’s sham justice system. The governance are crooks, operating according to the beliefs and rituals of the central organisational structure’s leadership.
The fact is that Baron Burnett of Maldon, the Lord Chief Justice, Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls, head of civil justice, Robert Buckland, the Lord Chancellor and Michael Ellis are colluding Zionist freemasons and enemies of the people, yet it is you, the people, who are paying their wages.
The Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights is a landmark Act setting out fundamental civil rights of the people. The Bill received the Royal Assent on 16 December 1689, making the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William III and Mary II in February 1689, statutory law.
The Bill lays down limits on the powers of the Monarch and sets out the rights of Parliament, including the requirement for regular parliaments, free elections, and freedom of speech in Parliament.
The Bill also sets out express rights of the people, including the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, confirming that “Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law“.
The Bill of Rights described and condemned several acts of tyranny by James II of England. The interesting and relevant parts of the Bill of Rights being violated today by the establishment, include:
- Promises of fines and forfeitures before conviction are illegal and void
- Excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted
- Election of members of Parliament ought to be free
The Human Rights Act 1988
Buckland and the Tory kleptocracy of likeminded Zionist freemasons have been wanting to do away with the Human Rights Act for years. In July this year, Buckland came under scrutiny for criticising the Parliamentary Committee for not taking evidence from voices that appeal to his motives.
Buckland said “whilst I accept the terms of reference we set out aren’t about the fundamental rights themselves, there will be voices saying “Well, hold on, is this structure so broke you can’t fix it other than by withdrawing from the whole framework?”
Buckland and his fellow brethren in power seek to erode the rights of the people, whereas the Human Rights Act protects the rights of the people, in particular Article 1 of the First Protocol:
“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law”.
Article 1 of the First Protocol of the Human Rights Act 1998
Are these the actions of freely elected public officials who at all times must act in the interests of the public? We think not.
The Coronation Oath – UK corruption
The Coronation Oaths Act of 1688 was designed to protect the people from tyranny inflicted by the Monarchy. In conjunction with the Bill of Rights of 1689, these Acts are unquestionably the most important parts of Britain’s written Constitution.
The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her, administered the Coronation Oath, which the Monarch undertook.
Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?
Queen: I solemnly promise so to do.
According to their respective laws and customs, means that the British people must be governed according to the laws of the land. But is that really happening when officers under the Crown are allowed to breach their oaths, inflicting acts of tyranny against the people in the name of justice? No, it is not.
Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?
Queen: I will.
“And I do declare That noe forreigne Prince Person Prelate , State or Potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction Power Superiority preeminence or Authorite Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this realme Soe helpe me God”
Under the Act it is effectual treason and sedition to give financial aid and support to any foreign government, individual or organisation who then uses such financial aid to try and destroy British sovereignty.
By giving royal assent to any Act purporting to bind Britain to the EU Constitution, the Monarch once again places herself in breach of her Coronation oath. The Queen has abdicated the Throne.
The Monarch has sworn to govern the people according to the laws of the land, but the constitutional oaths are those laws, indisputably, the Queen has, on this additional ground, abdicated the Throne
Those at the very highest echelons, the Monarch herself and the first ministers of state, along with a significant number of judges and public officials have acted in breach of their official oaths and therefore, officially, those offenders are not, in law, afforded those positions in office.
We, the British people, have the inalienable right to be governed justly by Parliament, the House of Lords, the Monarch and the courts of the Land, under rule of Tory Zionist freemasons, is that really happening we ask?